Home > Cycling > My Response to All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group
My Response to All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group
Posted on Friday, December 7, 2012 by Unknown
My evidence to the APPCG is here.
I hesitate to publish it since it is a personal response based on my experiences and is intended to cover what I perceive to be a gap in The Times and associated campaigns. Segregation (especially if it comes with the assumption which most would make that the existing streets are for the segregated motorised, and not non-motorised, traffic) cannot it seems to me be the only answer for the foreseeable future. We need a civilising of our streets (and Highways bar Motorways) everywhere so that they are more pleasant and inviting places to cycle.
Category Article Cycling
Popular Posts
-
I try not to get involved in too much "will-he-won't-he" speculation in these pages with, for example, the weekly statistica...
-
Arsenal Szczesny, Sagna, Mertesacker, Jenkinson, Monreal, Arteta, Wilshere, Ramsey, Walcott, Giroud, Cazorla. Subs: Mannone, Diaby, R...
-
Clean Sheet Rankings Powered by Tableau Attacking Rankings Powered by Tableau Individual Rankings Po...
-
Follow: March Madness, March Madness, March Madness, March Madness, College Basketball, March Madness, College Basketball, March Madness, 2...
-
Arsenal Szczesny, Sagna, Mertesacker, Vermaelen, Gibbs, Coquelin, Diaby, Walcott, Wilshere, Cazorla, Giroud Subs: Mannone, Koscielny, ...
-
It's been a busy couple of months for me which has unfortunately meant that posts around these parts have been minimal and basically l...
-
Lat week's publication of the Mayor of London's new Vision for Cycling in London has got to be welcome. The foreward (which has a...
-
Clean Sheet Rankings Powered by Tableau Attacking Rankings Powered by Tableau Individual Rankings On a recen...